Dredging thoughts

Based on information received, Lake Monticello was about 10 years behind when the dredging program began and substantial progress has been made rectifying that situation but there is still work to do. It has been estimated to take three years for a complete circuit around the lake, clearing out the shorelines. Looking into the future, as other actions are taken, such as the underwater best management process projects being planned at the head of the coves and those slowing the flow of debris further upstream, the amount of silt coming into the lake will diminish, thus providing some relief from the inflow of debris, even though never completely eliminating the need for dredging.

That brings me to wondering why it has been deemed as necessary to make a function that will have a diminishing need more productive. It will always take three years to make the circuit around the shores of the lake as long as we have one barge. The amount of time savings being argued in favor of another offload adjacent to Beach 2 will not put a dent in that fact, and even if it did, for what purpose? What would be the stated purpose of cutting the circuit time for going completely around the lake from 36 months to let's say 30 months as long as we are staying ahead of the silt inflows and consistently making progress to lake restoration? It is a job that never ends and with the other management processes being implemented it seems we can easily stay ahead of the need for dredging and may even get to the point that it is no longer an ongoing full-time job.

Trying to increase the productivity of the dredging operation is like trying to get those people that maintain the Golden Gate Bridge to paint faster. That bridge has constantly been painted and repainted since the day it was constructed and that process will continue forevermore. The only difference between the Golden Gate Bridge and our dredging operation is they may be able to benefit from a cost savings of less people, but we only have one person doing the dredging work. As long as progress is being made who really cares if it takes three years to go around the entire shoreline or a few months less? It makes no sense in that it is just a race against no stated objectives because there is no strategic purpose that is not already being accomplished.

–Robert Harris, Palmyra

Reject bulkhead idea

The Lake Monticello Board President recently offered a parsed response to growing community concerns about plans to install a cement dredging bulkhead next to Beach 2.  I thought his answers were gratuitously dismissive.

I don't live at the cove leading to that beach nor do I personally know anyone who does.  But they're my neighbors nonetheless.  I care about their safety concerns.  And I particularly care too that a pristine, tree-lined area immediately adjacent to Beach 2, in full view of beachgoers, boaters and nearby waterfront residents, will forever be lost and become a needless eyesore.  The Board president didn't address that issue.

Dredging is important, and the system here is manpower intensive.  But it would help if the dredging operator worked a full 40-hour week throughout the year, weather permitting.  He does not.  Then so be it that dredging processes take longer.  I believe that if our community was queried as we were prior to the very successful R & R Project that will benefit all of us, that the majority of residents would reject the Beach 2 bulkhead idea.

–Charles Domroe, Palmyra

Clown project

If you live in Lake Monticello and you've heard of the Beach 2 fiasco, and you want to know what is going on, drive over to Beach 4. Look over to the left. That is the silt transfer station with the concrete bulkhead, barge and dump truck. Look across the wide cove. It seems like most of the houses prefer the heavy tree screening to the view across the cove.

Then turn around and drive to Tufton Lake. This is the route of the dump truck that transports the silt and debris to the spoils site. It's a short drive, only 1.4 miles. Pretty simple and it only takes 4 - 5 minutes.

Now swing around and take a right on Jefferson Drive. You are now driving the dump truck route to Beach 2. The proposed and absolutely unnecessary second silt transfer site. Imagine you are driving a very large dump truck loaded with sloppy silt and debris all the way (4.4 miles) along the steep winding hills. Imagine at the Barret St. stop sign, the watery silt leaking out the back. Drive past the tricky intersections with Turkeysag Tr. and Slice Gate Rd. In the golf course area, look out for golf carts crossing the road.

Take a left on Colonial Rd. and follow the signs to Beach 2. That was a pretty long 13 minute drive.

Once you get there, enjoy the beautiful serenity of the place. Look across the small cove to the houses that enjoy the view. There is no tree screening there. The beach is considered by most to be the most beautiful of all the lake beaches. Look to your right at the tranquil end of the cove. That shallow peaceful area was considered prime breeding area for Bluegill and other fish and aquatic life. Not now, it has been ruined because they have dropped the depth from 6-12 inches to 5-6 feet. in order to facilitate the maneuvering of the loaded barge.

Visualize the concrete bulkhead, the barge and the dump truck, which will be just to the right of the beach. It should be dangerous to beach goers when the truck is backing in or out.

There is no benefit from this project, but it is going to cost us $85,000.

I can imagine perhaps, as you sit there, what you would be thinking, saying to yourself, maybe out loud – this is a clown project bro. Whose cockamamie idea is this? It’s the board’s idea bro.

–Tom Ellis, Lake Monticello

Rotary endowment starts ninth year

The Rose Deborah Altschull Endowment For Youth is launching its ninth annual "Bright Start For Kids" program and its fourth annual "Shoes For Success" program and wants your help.   Both programs are designed to help less fortunate elementary age school children in the Fluvanna area to have confidence and get the most they can out of their upcoming school year.

The bright start program provides 60 children with all the back-to-school necessities stuffed into brand new backpacks that are packed by Rotarians and delivered to Central Elementary School just before the school opening in early August.

The shoes program allows 80 deserving elementary age school children to come with their parents or guardians to the Walmart at Zion Crossroads and pick out their very own new pair of shoes.  This year the kids will be invited to the store on Aug. 2 for their shopping event.

The endowment was started on April 2, 2008 and has shown a steady growth pattern from day one.  We now have over 436 different donors and many of those have contributed multiple times.  This year we have already provided $1,000 for a special reading program at the elementary school that allowed over 60 children to go through a five-week session in June and July to improve their reading skills in preparation for this year’s school start.   We also provided funding to send six children to the 4H sleep away camp at Camp Holiday in Brunswick County in the month of June.

If you are moved to help us in our mission to help sponsor a child heading back to school we would really appreciate your contributions in any amount. To pay for a "stuffed backpack" a donation of $50 will cover the entire cost.  To pay for a new pair of shoes a donation of $20 will send a child dancing back to school in style.   The endowment is a part of and managed by the Rotary Foundation Of Fluvanna County.  All donations are 100 percent tax deductible.   Therefore contributions should be written to "The Rotary Foundation Of Fluvanna County Virginia" with a note in the memo section of the check to direct the donation to "The Rose Deborah Altschull Endowment For Youth."   The mailing address is:  Rotary Club Of Fluvanna County, 265 Turkeysag Tr., Suite 102, Box 114, Palmyra, Virginia 22963.

–Cliff Altschull, Palmyra




Add a comment

Slow down

I do not understand why municipalities and the Department of Motor Vehicles always come up with the most expensive solutions.  Here's one that won't cost much: slow down.  The speed limit within Palmyra is 35 miles per hour (mph). The amount of traffic that goes in and out of Turkeysag at Lake Monticello far exceeds that which turns left or right off of Rt.15 in Palmyra, yet the speed limit on Rt.53 is 55 mph – why?

Here are some solutions that are inexpensive: (1) on South Boston, from Rt. 618 to Broken Island, make it 35 mph (this will make it safer for folks exiting and entering Riverside and safer around all those curves); and (2) on Rt. 53, from Rt. 618 to Turkeysag also make it 35 mph (this will make it safer for folks entering/exiting at Tufton and a whole lot safer for folks at Turkeysag).

We won't need turn lanes and just think of the revenue possibilities from those folks who refuse to obey the lower limits.  You may grumble, but if we're talking about making our roads safer, we don't have to spend millions of dollars, we just have to slow down.

Carol Parsons, Lake Monticello

Safety concerns

The safety of Lake Monticello residents has lately been either ignored or dismissed in terms of our roads, entrances and one of our beaches.  The Lake Monticello Owners' Association (LMOA) plan to build a dredger bulkhead at Beach 2 is misguided and dangerous. Barge transits though the narrow channels around the beach would be near a popular swimming area. Environmental concerns for loss of water habitats should also be considered. But why force spoils trucks to drive through additional residential streets and navigate a steep incline?

On the subject of trucks, I'm not sure if LMOA has established a real policy on trucks delivering building equipment and material to the new Bunker recreational building at the golf course or not. If a policy is now in effect, is it being enforced by instructing all vendors to enter at the Fairway Gate on Slice Road?

Finally, the Fluvanna Review's article on July 7 examining the addition of a left turn lane at the Tufton Gate entrance on Rt. 53 failed to mention an important fact. In September of 2009 LMOA purchased a lot on Jefferson Drive opposite Lafayette Drive for the express purpose of installing an entrance that would connect to Rt. 618. Under the guidance of Gene Ott, a member of the Fluvanna County Board of Supervisors at that time, it was determined that adding this entrance would alleviate much of the traffic at Tufton Gate for residents in Sections 2 and 5 heading west on Rt. 53.  VDOT was enthusiastic with their endorsement of this project. If the cost of purchasing land on Rt. 53 for a left turn lane is prohibitive, why not pursue a much more affordable alternative?

Here's another way to look at these issues. Just three years ago LMOA sponsored and organized a yearly weekend of resident yard sales. Maps and signs were provided. The entire plan was scrapped because of safety issues and possible lawsuits. If residents parking on neighborhood streets was deemed unsafe, how can LMOA justify ignoring the concerns of residents in regard to tractor trailers, spoils trucks and dredging barges?

Julius Neelley, Lake Monticello


Tired of footing the bill

One lesson from both Democrats and Republicans in the recent presidential primary season: we the people are tired of watching business reap financial rewards while we foot the bill. One message about taxes from our country’s current president: business should pay a little more so ordinary folks can pay a little less.

Fluvanna supervisors did not learn the lesson. They did not get the message.

Our county’s supervisors currently are considering measures that would reduce certain taxes, notably the personal property tax, on businesses. The offset, of course, will be that we who support the county with real estate taxes will pay more.

Supervisor Tony O’Brien ran for office on a promise to increase business contributions to our revenue base, thereby reducing taxes for the rest of us. Yet he leads the effort to cut business taxes. He also advocates reducing land use tax abatement, a move which could hit many ordinary folks hard.

Mozell Booker calls herself a Democrat but strongly supports these business tax cuts based on trickle-down Reaganomics. Patricia Eager and Mike Sheridan are consistent in their support of breaks for business. Reducing personal property tax on business was the most visible promise of Sheridan’s campaign.

Only Don Weaver, a self-described conservative, sides with ordinary folks on taxes. His populist stand against tax cuts for businesses in Fluvanna is refreshing.

Already, our Board of Supervisors has committed millions of dollars to business through expensive water systems that hold little possibility of tax relief for ordinary citizens. Now supervisors want to cut business taxes, including those that would help offset profligate water line spending.

It’s time for our supervisors to study the lesson. Maybe, somehow, they will get the message.

Dennis Holder, Kents Store

Thanks from Vest family

We write with grateful appreciation to family, friends, Fluvanna Fire and Rescue, Fluvanna County Public School students and employees, and local churches.

“In everything give thanks; for this is the will of God in Christ Jesus concerning you.”
 (I Thessalonians 5:18)

In the midst of our sadness, our hearts are overflowing with joy at the love and kindness you have shown.  Your outpouring of support to our family throughout George’s illness and his passing has been gratefully appreciated.  You have touched our hearts providing much needed comfort.  Your thoughts and actions continue to show that there are caring people surrounding us.

Many thanks and blessing to you in your daily lives.  Grace be with you all as God continues to keep you in his care.

With grateful appreciation and much love...

The family of George Jones Vest – Gloria, Jana, and Cameron (Na’)

Add a comment

My compliments and encouragement to the management of Central Virginia Electric Cooperative for their efforts to bring clean, renewable solar energy to its customers. It is refreshing to know that we consumer owners, our environment, and our health dictate CVEC’s long term strategies. I am pleased that we electric users in Fluvanna County are served by a not for profit, public cooperative that has the advantage of focusing on these needs rather than by a private utility whose sole motivating force is short term shareholder profit.
John Wilkinson, 

Cormier for Lake Board of Directors
Historically, most good leaders started as those who best served their communities and, as a result, their neighbors asked them to serve at a higher level. This is the community leader that I know Larry Cormier to be.

Larry spent a career at Dominion Power working his way up from a young helper, to leading hundreds of men and women and, after many years, retired from that same company. When his spiritual life grew, by his nature Larry worked to spread the blessings by not only serving as a teacher and on church council as chair, but he and his wife Paula moved to Africa for a year to work as missionaries. Today he serves as a very active volunteer for Meals on Wheels, Habitat for Humanity and here at the Lake, on the golf committee. Larry is a doer, a worker. A first sign of his leadership typically comes from him being the first to pick up one end. He is a man of integrity, if he says it you can believe it. But still with such strong qualities, he is always humble with a warm smile, and a big heart.

I grew up at Lake Monticello, I raised my family here and I suspect at some point, my grandchildren will live here. I hope to protect what we have while seeing positive changes for our future and I believe that Larry is the perfect candidate to help make these things happen. If you live at Lake Monticello, won’t you please join me on June 25 at the Lake fire house, 10 a.m. until 1 p.m. to vote for Larry Cormier as our next Board of Directors member?
Chris Fairchild, 
Lake Monticello

Add a comment

Virginia’s 5th Congressional District is a large, diverse region that represents bustling, affluent communities to the north which sharply contrast with areas to the south that have suffered considerable losses and high unemployment with the decline in tobacco farming and the closing of furniture and textile industries.

Jane Dittmar, realizing the current Congressman was not addressing such problems, decided to run for this office so she could apply her energy, experience, and knowledge to serving, not just some of the economic, political, and social groups in the 5th District, but everyone of every age who lives here.

Jane Dittmar resides in Albemarle County with her husband, Frank Squillace, and their six children. She graduated from the University of Virginia with a degree in economics and also attended UVa.’s Darden School of Education’s Executive Program and the Virginia Center for Public Administration. Furthermore, she is a Virginia Supreme Court certified mediator for both general district and circuit courts. Just imagine how valuable her mediation skills would be in the battleground known as the U.S. Congress!

She has previously owned several small businesses and was the president and CEO of the Charlottesville Regional Chamber of Commerce from 1992-2000. She also served as chair of the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors.

An estimated 283,860 people in Virginia’s 5th District are without broadband Internet service. Many of us take this technology for granted. However, those without broadband do not have valuable access to basic information, telemedicine, emergency services, and online job searches. Education is designed to prepare our children for the future, but students who do not have Internet access at home will surely struggle to succeed in school and beyond.

Jane Dittmar has a vision for the 5th District to connect all of its people to each other and to federal resources, modern infrastructure, and access to affordable broadband service that will greatly improve the ability to get a proper education and search for employment.

Jane Dittmar is the type of person Virginia and the U.S. Congress need! Please go to her website at http://janeforcongress.com to learn more about this caring, qualified candidate.

Jeannine “JJ” Towler,


Add a comment

As the presidential primary process rounds its final lap let's pause and examine what's at stake. I ask each and every potential voter: Who denies climate change on an entirely new level? Whose carbon footprint stomps down like no other candidate with his private jet returning to New York after each performance? Who has vowed to cancel our participation in the Paris climate accord?  Well, it's Donald Trump.

As the presumptive Republican Party nominee for the presidency, Donald Trump has been called many things:  a vulgarian, a threat to our democracy, a modern day Caligula and most of all, an egomaniac who cares first and foremost about himself. If Trump was only an invention, he would be easily dismissed as a wild exaggeration. If he was an unruly bully, he would be suspended from school and sent home. But as a candidate for the most powerful head of state in the world, Trump would be an environmental nightmare gone wrong. Why unleash on the world the worst of what America represents?

In April, the Mauna Loa Observatory, which monitors atmospheric carbon dioxide, recorded a daily reading of 409.3 parts per million. That is a level of atmospheric carbon dioxide content that this planet has not seen for the last 15 million years. A goal in last year's climate talks in Paris is to keep global temperatures from rising above two degrees Celsius, a threshold level not to be crossed according to climate scientists the world over. Showing just how monumental this task has become are these recent statistics: every hour of every day 3.7 million barrels of oil are extracted from the Earth, 932,000 tons of coal are removed from the Earth, 395 million cubic meters of natural gas are pumped from the Earth and 4.1 million tons of carbon dioxide are put into the Earth's atmosphere.

It's time we consider voting like our future depends on it.

Julius Neelley, Lake Monticello

Add a comment