Grocery costs push families toward smaller portions, meatless meals

Fluvanna Review Staff

Rising grocery prices are changing what families put on the dinner table, with many households buying less meat, serving smaller portions, and planning meals around weekly sales.

A state-level analysis of a national survey commissioned by MarketBeat estimates that 63% of Virginia households have reduced the amount or type of meat, seafood or dairy they purchase because of rising grocery prices.

The financial media company surveyed 3,042 adults across the United States in July. The national sample was weighted to broadly reflect U.S. adults by age, gender and region, with responses then analyzed nationally and by state.

MarketBeat did not provide the number of Virginia respondents or a state-level margin of error, meaning the Virginia figures should be viewed as estimates rather than precise measurements of household behavior.

Within those estimates, beef appears to have taken the biggest hit. Forty-three percent identified beef as the main animal protein their household had reduced, compared with 10% who selected fish or seafood. Chicken or turkey and pork were each named by 8%, followed by dairy at 7%.

Nearly half said their household had replaced beef with a vegetarian protein source, such as beans or lentils.

Meatless meals have also become a regular budgeting strategy. MarketBeat estimates that 51% of Virginia households now serve a meal without meat or fish at least twice a week specifically to save money.

That includes 10% who do so daily, 13% who prepare four to six meatless meals each week, and 28% who serve them two or three times a week. Another 16% reported serving a meatless meal once a week, while 22% said they never do so specifically for financial reasons.

“For many people, meat and seafood have traditionally been treated as a basic part of the weekly grocery shopping, but these findings show that many households are now approaching it as an expense that must be carefully managed,” said MarketBeat founder Matt Paulson. “Families are doing more than changing brands. They are changing what they eat, how often they eat it and how much they put on the plate.”

Eggs were the most commonly cited lower-cost alternative, selected by 24% of respondents. Processed meats, including hot dogs and deli meat, followed at 13%, with beans at 12%. Canned fish, peanut butter, dairy products and lentils were also named as budget substitutes.

The survey also found signs that higher food prices may be affecting how groceries are divided within families. An estimated 58% of respondents said they had eaten a smaller portion or skipped a protein-rich food so their children or another household member could have more.

“This may be the most concerning finding in the survey,” Paulson said. “People are not only changing what they buy. Many are eating less themselves so someone else in the household can have more. That shows how much grocery prices are affecting everyday life around the family dinner table.”

For many parents, supermarket promotions are increasingly determining what goes into the shopping cart. Seven in 10 parents said they decide which protein to purchase mainly based on what is discounted that week.

Overall, 67% said rising prices had made meat, seafood and dairy feel more like luxuries than basic groceries. Nearly one-third also reported increased disagreements within their households over spending on those foods.

Related Posts